Hey, if I could, I would have hacked google to say it. But google beat me to it!
Not a lot of time to post today, but I saw this article this morning, and it is exactly what I am saying about Clicks and Online Advertising in Vietnam. From AdAge:
In particular, we noted negative correlations with a consumer’s intent to view (for TV shows or movie campaigns), ad exposure time, ad recall and awareness. Put another way, we were able to conclude that online consumers given to clicking on ads are actually less likely to either spend significant time viewing advertisements or to recall them later. And, perhaps more importantly, that optimizing an online campaign to solely focus on CTR is quite likely to have a negative impact on other valuable brand measures.
As it’s been said before, the point of any advertising is not to drive clicks — it’s to build a brand, boost sales or add revenue streams.
About six months ago, the Vietnamese branch of the Internet was abuzz with connectivity issues to Facebook. Basically, certain ISPs (SDC/VDC and Viettel) had blocked the DNS records of www.facebook.com, which led to a variety of workarounds used to get to Facebook.com including:
More details of this blockage could be found here at my friend Huy’s page, http://www.huyzing.com.
The VDC/SDC and Viettel blockage continued for about a month and disappeared without much fanfare. Optimists here in Vietnam saw it as a dodged bullet, and that the government had decided not to travel down the same road that China has gone down. In China, Facebook (and Youtube I believe) are blocked. Around this time Google had also decided to leave China and uncensored its search engine results (read Tiannemen, Tibet and Panda porn).
Over the weekend, it looks like the other shoe has dropped. ISP VNPT has blocked access to Facebook, and the above workarounds have not been able to access Facebook.
I have received that these workaround do work though:
If Facebook goes, who would win? ZingMe? Go-online.vn? I’m not sure, though I for sure think that the population would lose out in general.
I just love this AT&T banner game. For one, it puts the game inside the banner, thereby maximizing the game’s reach. In Vietnam, very often we see games being embedded in the center of a microsite, which reduces its reach by a factor of 1,000. An average CTR in Vietnam is 0.1%, or 1 out of every 1,000 people who see a banner will click on it.
By putting the game in the banner, they have vastly increased the chances of people playing in the game.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJX1JheBe0A&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
On the other side, this game actually uses a real life mechanic of “heading” the ball. Instead of manufacturing an artificial behavior to highlight Augmented Reality, AT&T uses a gesture that users are already familiar with. The banner brings you right into the soccer game. A motion capture technology called ZugMO from interactive marketing agency Zugara. You in a very real sense are taking part in the game.
As head of a leading digital advertising agency here, my job requires that I keep an eye on what my competitors are doing. Furthermore, I also have to provide advice on what creatives work, and which do not.
I often look back at the good example by Richard Burrage, Managing Director of Cimigo, a leading market research company here in Vietnam. Besides extolling the virtues of good data, he also analyzes actively the results of various TVC campaigns, and tries to provide best creative practices to the ATL advertising community here.
For me, I’m trying to do something similar with online campaigns.
Take this banner from leading (#2 or #3 in Vietnam) mobile telecom provider Vinaphone. This is a typical creative in Vietnam, neither exceptionally good or exceptionally poor.
It is however a great example of how people ignore design with online banners. There are three different images/logs, equally sized in this banner along with a message. When a designer presents a banner like this to me, I have but to ask: Who is the hero?
The hero to me, is the focal point of a creative. It is normally either the product or the consumer, and illustrates how our lives, the consumers’ lives, are improved by the company/brand/stuff being sold. It is that simple.
In this banner though, we see three images, only one of which relates to the service being sold. The message is explicit, and written in the banner. (Oh, I wish it was a catchy strapline!)
At the end of the day, this creative is an example of lazy design. Slap a couple logos together, get a copywriter (or don’t get a copywriter) to “tell” instead of “show” and call it a day. I’m not sure who is at fault for this banner, the agency or the advertiser, but at the end of the day, they both should be ashamed for letting this come to light.
So, it’s 6pm, I’m sitting in my office, and I’m waiting for my team to finish up some work.
So I might as well write up a free business idea.
One of the hottest sectors online for companies is iPhone and iPad applications. Steve Jobs, in his infinite wisdom (and why not, he’s way more successful than me) has decided that applications need to be done in Apple’s proprietary Cocoa language, and that Flash will not work on Apple’s devices.
Last year, the iPhone was the only touch screen device out there. Now there are a plethora of Android phones, and a smattering of Palm OS phones. For every Palm OS app, there are 100 Android apps, and for every Android App, there’s 1,000 iPhone apps.
The business need? The people who have built or own successful iPhone apps probably want versions for the Android. Android is rapidly catching up to the iPhone in device usage, and it has fragmented into three or four different kinds of versions (2.1, 2.2 Froyo and HTC Sense, for instance). iPhone app businesses will pay people to translate their app to Android, and also adapt it for the various screen sizes and resolutions that Android is churning out.
Should HP and Palm get their acts together, there will be a further market for porting iPhone applications to PalmOS. Or whatever Symbian evolves into from Nokia. A small, smart group of developers could do pretty well doing this.
To my knowledge, no one has done this yet.
I have a bunch of business ideas that I am always floating around. I enjoy talking about them, researching them and batting them around like a kitten bats around a ball of yarn. I think I end up wasting a lot of time with my endeavors, and unfortunately a lot of the precious time of those around me. Yet, people still are supportive of me, which leads me to believe that a. I have some good ideas or potential, or b. I’m mildly entertaining.
For the most part, I think I’m going to lump myself in with category b, mildly entertaining. I’ve done some Adsense arbitrage, affiliate marketing and various blackhat content scraping schemes in the past. For my personal stuff, I will do some private, whitehat projects.
But there are only 24 hours in a day, and there will always be time for whiskey to be drunk and time for me to spend with a good book I hate to see good ideas wasted, so expect to see some show up in this space from time to time. If anyone wants to sit down and discuss them with me, I am more than happy to!
Advertising is more of an art than a science. And even though you can measure everything online, it is very difficult to measure the success of an online ad campaign. Even though it is difficult, this does not mean you should not try. The challenge with online, is that there are enough variables and information available, that marketers hold online marketing channels to a higher standard than traditional media.
For example, print media’s KPI is normally measured by two numbers, circulation and readership. Television is defined by the number of rating points a show has. Internet has available anywhere from 3 to 30 different statistics available.
There’s no precise way to measure the success of an ad campaign. For a lot of brands, you cannot determine how much revenue is generated b each advertising dollar spent. However, there are certain ways for you to measure and determine your campaign’s success.
At New Media Edge, we believe that each campaign should have its own singular goal. Make sure you have clear advertising goals. Having one clear goal allows you to focus your media plan and more importantly identify the KPIs that are important to your campaign.
Sample campaign goals may include:
Fundamentally, in online advertising and in may other facets of life, I believe “Simple, done well, wins.”
There is an elegance and a strength in having a singular purpose, a simple campaign mechanic and a simple report.
This singular campaign lets you select specific online channels. There are more online channels than most people imagine, and the most common ones are:
And for each channel, there are specific KPIs for them. For example:
It can be quite dizzying, the number of metrics available online. The only way to navigate this treacherous maze of metrics is to stay focused on the campaign objective. Being clear on the campaign objective will allow you to read the correct report and track the correct KPI.
For simple branding campaigns, your key KPI will be impressions, reach and frequency. Impressions are the number of times that someone sees the ad. For branding though, the most important campaign metric is reach and frequency. Reach is the number of people that have seen a display ad, and frequency is the number of times someone has seen an ad.
The media plan and ad spots for a branding campaign have unique qualities, different from other ad spots. They need to be large, at the top of the page. Large enough so they dominate the page, almost edging out the content itself. In the US and the UK, where advertising budgets are big, publishers normally have 1-3 ad units per page. Contrast this to Vietnam’s top publisher Vietnam Express has almost 20 adspots on its homepage. Certainly, a VNExpress impression is not the same as a US ad spot. Clutter and ad position both are important factors in media planning.
Once you have determined a single campaign goal and the correct metric, you need to setup the correct analytic tools to measure your KPIs. Adserving (from technology providers like Eyeblaster and DoubleClick) was developed to provide a fair ruler to measure the effectiveness of banners. Both Eyeblaster, DoubleClick and OpenX (their open source cousin) have some click fraud detection built in, though for performance campaigns where clicks are important, it is best to use a dedicated click fraud testing tool (like ClickForensics).
So, how does one measure campaign success? Most people ask me for shortcuts. ”What is the one number that tells me I was successful?” they ask. I always have to shrug and remind them my process of building and managing campaigns. Once you follow the process, you will know which channel to run your campaign on, and hopefully, the applicable KPI.
I saw this post from the often excellent Copyblogger, written by the seriously always excellent Hugh MacLeod. Well, I’ll just put his cartoon here, and you can go to the post to see the awesome. The topic above gives you a good hint of what the post is about though.
I realized this morning that much of online advertising in Vietnam is game design. Somehow, the digital channel has become a channel where advertisers and marketers trick their consumers into playing games in “branded experiences.” The naive thinking is that the more times consumers are forced to see a company logo, this reinforcement will automatically translate into sales. These games rarely (if ever) delve into the actual benefits of the product.
See Adage and Bannerblog’s Six Foundations of Great Creative
And to be honest, most product benefits can be explained through a story. Games do have their place in advertising. However, the best campaigns in the world are not games. They are creatives that educate or entertain the consumer. And yes, you can entertain a consumer without resorting to a game. See for instance – viral videos.